Comparison of Endometrial Receptivity Between Agonist and Antagonist Protocol in Mice Uterus
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
comparison between conventional and alternative technique in extraction of maxillary molars
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولThe effect of intracerebroventricular administration of CCK receptor agonist and antagonist in nerve-Iigated mice
In the present study the effect of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of cerulein, an agonist of CCK receptor and proglumide, a receptor antagonist for hyperalgesia induced by sciatic nerve ligation were investigated in mice. Subcutaneous administration of morphine caused anti-nociception in both intact and nerve-ligated mice. However, the response to opioids was lower in ligated mice as c...
متن کاملassessment of deep word knowledge in elementary and advanced iranian efl learners: a comparison of selective and productive wat tasks
testing plays a vital role in any language teaching program. it allows teachers and stakeholders, including program administrators, parents, admissions officers and prospective employers to be assured that the learners are progressing according to an accepted standard (douglas, 2010). the problems currently facing language testers have both practical and theoretical implications but the first i...
comparison of the amount of debris extruded apically in two rotary techniques: flexmaster and m2
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولRedefining Endometrial Receptivity
However, the notion of receptivity as a static state in which the tissue is poised, frozen in time, awaiting the arrival of an adequately developed embryo, is naïve. An integrative definition of receptivity must embrace communication between maternal and embryonic tissues. At receptivity, the endometrium has reached a point at which negotiation can begin that may or may not lead to successful i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bali Medical Journal
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2302-2914,2089-1180
DOI: 10.15562/bmj.v5i3.316